In a widely anticipated step, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai has released a draft Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”) on the legal framework that governs broadband providers and related net neutrality questions.

Most notably from a privacy perspective, the draft NPRM proposes to find that broadband Internet access service is an “information service” under the Communications Act, reversing the 2015 “telecommunications service” classification that had brought broadband providers under the statutory privacy requirements of Title II of that Act.

The draft NPRM states that the 2015 reclassification “stripped FTC authority over Internet service providers,” in light of the common carrier exemption in Section 5 of the FTC Act.  By reversing the FCC’s prior finding that broadband is a common carrier service, the draft NPRM proposes to “return jurisdiction over Internet service providers’ privacy practices to the FTC, with its decades of experience and expertise in this area.”

The scope of the FTC’s enforcement jurisdiction over non-common carrier activities of communications providers—a category that would include broadband under the NPRM’s proposed framework—was the subject of a recent Ninth Circuit decision.  The draft NPRM points out that the FCC has supported the FTC’s petition for rehearing of that decision, which interpreted the scope of FTC Act’s common carrier exemption in a broad manner.

In addition to undoing the 2015 reclassification, the NPRM would, among other things:

  • Propose to eliminate the “Internet conduct standard,” through which the FCC makes case-by-case determinations about whether conduct not covered by bright-line rules is harmful to net neutrality principles (which has included review of practices alternately referred to as “zero rating” or “free data”);
  • Solicit comment on whether to retain, modify, or eliminate bright-line rules adopted in 2015 that generally prohibit broadband providers from blocking, throttling, or paid prioritization of lawful content;
  • Solicit comment on whether to retain, modify, or eliminate the transparency rule, which requires broadband providers to disclose publicly their commercial terms, network management practices, and network performance; and
  • Solicit comment on the sources of legal authority and costs and benefits of net neutrality regulation.

Chairman Pai has asked his fellow Commissioners to vote on the NPRM at the FCC’s next monthly meeting, scheduled for May 18, 2017.  If adopted in its current form, the NPRM would set the deadline for comments on July 17, 2017, with reply comments due August 16, 2017.

For additional information about the draft NPRM, please see our client alert on the subject.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Matthew DelNero Matthew DelNero

Matt DelNero provides expert regulatory counsel to companies of all sizes in the telecommunications, technology and media sectors. As a former senior official with the FCC and longtime private practitioner, Matt helps clients achieve their goals and navigate complex regulatory and public policy…

Matt DelNero provides expert regulatory counsel to companies of all sizes in the telecommunications, technology and media sectors. As a former senior official with the FCC and longtime private practitioner, Matt helps clients achieve their goals and navigate complex regulatory and public policy challenges.

Matt serves as co-chair of Covington’s Technology & Communications Regulation (“TechComm”) Practice Group and co-chair of the firm’s Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion initiative.

Matt advises clients on the full range of issues impacting telecommunications, technology and media providers today, including:

  • Structuring and securing FCC and other regulatory approvals for media and telecommunications transactions.
  • Obtaining approval for foreign investment in broadcasters and telecommunications providers.
  • Broadband funding under federal and state programs, including under the FCC’s Universal Service Fund (USF) and NTIA’s Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program.
  • Representing broadcasters, media networks, and other content owners and producers on both existing and proposed FCC regulations and policies.
  • FCC enforcement actions and inquiries.
  • Online video accessibility, including under the Communications and Video Accessibility Act (CVAA) and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
  • Equipment authorizations for IoT and other devices.
  • Spectrum policy and auctions, including for 5G.
  • Privacy and data protection, with a focus on telecommunications and broadband providers.

Matt also maintains an active pro bono practice representing LGBTQ+ and other asylum seekers, as well as veterans petitioning for discharge upgrades—including discharges under ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ and predecessor policies that targeted LGBTQ+ servicemembers.

Prior to rejoining Covington in January 2017, Matt served as Chief of the FCC’s Wireline Competition Bureau. He played a leading role in development of policies around net neutrality, broadband privacy, and broadband deployment and affordability under the federal Universal Service Fund (USF).

Chambers USA ranks Matt within “Band 1” in his field and reports that he is a “go-to attorney for complex matters before the FCC and other federal agencies, drawing on impressive former government experience.” It also quotes clients who praise him as “an outstanding regulatory lawyer…[who] understands the intersection between what’s important for the client’s operations and how the law impacts those operations.”