The California Attorney General recently announced a settlement with DoorDash to resolve allegations that DoorDash violated the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and the California Online Privacy Protection Act (CalOPPA). 

According to the complaint, this enforcement action arose from DoorDash’s alleged participation in a “marketing cooperative.”  The California Attorney General claimed that such cooperatives, where businesses disclose their customer’s personal information to the cooperative in order to mail advertisements to consumers on behalf of participants, constitute a “sale” under the CCPA.  The Attorney General alleged that DoorDash did not post a “Do Not Sell My Personal Information” link on its website and mobile app. 

The Attorney General sent DoorDash a “notice of alleged CCPA noncompliance” related to this behavior in 2020.  At the time, the CCPA provided for a cure period, which allowed businesses to avoid liability for CCPA violations if they cured the alleged violation within 30 days of notice.  However, although DoorDash had ceased participation in marketing cooperatives by the time it received the notice, the Attorney General took the position that DoorDash had not cured its previous sale of data because it did not “restore them to the same position they would have been in if their data had never been sold.”  

The complaint further alleges a CalOPPA violation because DoorDash did not disclose in its privacy policy that it shared personally identifiable information with marketing cooperatives.

Under the terms of the settlement, DoorDash will pay a civil penalty of $375,000.  The settlement reiterates DoorDash’s obligation to comply with both CCPA and CalOPPA, and specifically to disclose any future participation in marketing cooperatives in its privacy policy and notice at collection.  DoorDash must also implement and maintain a compliance program for three years, and report annually to the Attorney General summarizing its compliance program and certifying its compliance with the terms of the settlement.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Lindsey Tonsager Lindsey Tonsager

Lindsey Tonsager co-chairs the firm’s global Data Privacy and Cybersecurity practice. She advises clients in their strategic and proactive engagement with the Federal Trade Commission, the U.S. Congress, the California Privacy Protection Agency, and state attorneys general on proposed changes to data protection…

Lindsey Tonsager co-chairs the firm’s global Data Privacy and Cybersecurity practice. She advises clients in their strategic and proactive engagement with the Federal Trade Commission, the U.S. Congress, the California Privacy Protection Agency, and state attorneys general on proposed changes to data protection laws, and regularly represents clients in responding to investigations and enforcement actions involving their privacy and information security practices.

Lindsey’s practice focuses on helping clients launch new products and services that implicate the laws governing the use of artificial intelligence, data processing for connected devices, biometrics, online advertising, endorsements and testimonials in advertising and social media, the collection of personal information from children and students online, e-mail marketing, disclosures of video viewing information, and new technologies.

Lindsey also assesses privacy and data security risks in complex corporate transactions where personal data is a critical asset or data processing risks are otherwise material. In light of a dynamic regulatory environment where new state, federal, and international data protection laws are always on the horizon and enforcement priorities are shifting, she focuses on designing risk-based, global privacy programs for clients that can keep pace with evolving legal requirements and efficiently leverage the clients’ existing privacy policies and practices. She conducts data protection assessments to benchmark against legal requirements and industry trends and proposes practical risk mitigation measures.

Photo of Jayne Ponder Jayne Ponder

Jayne Ponder provides strategic advice to national and multinational companies across industries on existing and emerging data privacy, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence laws and regulations.

Jayne’s practice focuses on helping clients launch and improve products and services that involve laws governing data privacy…

Jayne Ponder provides strategic advice to national and multinational companies across industries on existing and emerging data privacy, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence laws and regulations.

Jayne’s practice focuses on helping clients launch and improve products and services that involve laws governing data privacy, artificial intelligence, sensitive data and biometrics, marketing and online advertising, connected devices, and social media. For example, Jayne regularly advises clients on the California Consumer Privacy Act, Colorado AI Act, and the developing patchwork of U.S. state data privacy and artificial intelligence laws. She advises clients on drafting consumer notices, designing consent flows and consumer choices, drafting and negotiating commercial terms, building consumer rights processes, and undertaking data protection impact assessments. In addition, she routinely partners with clients on the development of risk-based privacy and artificial intelligence governance programs that reflect the dynamic regulatory environment and incorporate practical mitigation measures.

Jayne routinely represents clients in enforcement actions brought by the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general, particularly in areas related to data privacy, artificial intelligence, advertising, and cybersecurity. Additionally, she helps clients to advance advocacy in rulemaking processes led by federal and state regulators on data privacy, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence topics.

As part of her practice, Jayne also advises companies on cybersecurity incident preparedness and response, including by drafting, revising, and testing incident response plans, conducting cybersecurity gap assessments, engaging vendors, and analyzing obligations under breach notification laws following an incident.

Jayne maintains an active pro bono practice, including assisting small and nonprofit entities with data privacy topics and elder estate planning.

Photo of Jessica Ke Jessica Ke

Jessica Ke is an associate in the firm’s Privacy and Cybersecurity and Advertising and Consumer Protection Investigations practice groups. Jessica advises clients on a wide range of regulatory and compliance issues, including compliance with state comprehensive privacy laws, advertising substantiation issues, and participation…

Jessica Ke is an associate in the firm’s Privacy and Cybersecurity and Advertising and Consumer Protection Investigations practice groups. Jessica advises clients on a wide range of regulatory and compliance issues, including compliance with state comprehensive privacy laws, advertising substantiation issues, and participation in the regulatory process. Jessica also maintains an active pro bono practice.