On March 12, 2026, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“ANPRM”) seeking public comment on a proposed rulemaking focusing on potential unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the rental housing market. This ANPRM contemplates requiring landlords and property managers to provide full, upfront disclosure of all mandatory charges before a consumer applies for or commits to a lease. The FTC is evaluating whether certain rental‑related fees (e.g., application fees, administrative fees, convenience charges, amenity fees, and other add‑on fees) constitute unfair or deceptive practices when they are not clearly disclosed upfront or bear no reasonable relationship to the underlying cost of the service.

Comments are due on April 13, 2026. The FTC may then decide whether to proceed to a notice of proposed rulemaking or take no further action. The ANPRM seeks detailed input on how rental fees are structured, disclosed, and experienced by consumers throughout the leasing lifecycle. In particular, the FTC is seeking market studies, economic data, and other empirical evidence. The agency is specifically requesting comments on:

  • Total Rent: Whether rental housing providers clearly and conspicuously disclose the true total rent, including all mandatory fees and charges.
  • Fees and Charges: Whether rental housing providers clearly and conspicuously disclose the nature, purpose, amount, refundability, optionality, and recurrence of fees and charges.
  • Application Fees: Whether rental housing providers engage in application‑fee practices, such as excessive fees, nondisclosure, or charging multiple applicants for the same unit, that might harm or fail to provide a benefit to consumers.
  • Security Deposits: Whether rental housing providers engage in certain security‑deposit practices, such as failing to provide clear terms, taking improper deductions, or delaying refunds.
  • Billing Issues: Whether rental housing providers engage in certain billing practices, such as inaccurate statements, assessing charges that are not adequately disclosed, or marketing add‑on products or services.
  • Consumer Choice: Whether rental housing providers engage in practices that could impede consumer choice, such as opaque pricing, restrictive policies, or misleading representations.
  • Third-Party Service Providers: The role third-party service providers play in the advertising of the true total rent and whether such service providers place any “impediments” on the ability of rental housing property owners or managers to advertise the true total rent in their own advertising and third-party advertising.

While the ANPRM is asking the public to comment on whether a rule is needed, the agency’s proposed topics of interest highlight potential implications for industry stakeholders:

  • Landlords and Property Managers: A rulemaking could increase compliance obligations around fee disclosure, documentation, and pricing justification, and potentially require revisions to existing fee schedules.
  • Rental Platforms and Property‑Tech Providers: Companies may need to adjust user interfaces and listing practices to ensure standardized presentation of total rental costs.
  • Consumer‑Facing Communications: Marketing materials, online listings, and leasing workflows may need updates to ensure compliance with any new “all‑in pricing” requirements.

This initiative is part of the FTC’s broader campaign against “junk fees” across consumer‑facing industries and follows recent enforcement actions involving hidden or undisclosed rental charges.  If promulgated, the rule will create a federal baseline for rental fee transparency, supplementing existing state and local requirements and requiring rental housing providers with multi‑state portfolios to reexamine their compliance practices. Covington will continue to monitor developments related to this rulemaking and related enforcement activity.  If you have any questions concerning the material discussed in this blog post, please contact the members of our Advertising and Consumer Protection Investigations practice.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Andrew Smith Andrew Smith

Andrew Smith advises clients on retail financial services, data protection, advertising and consumer protection, technology, credit reporting, and e-commerce issues. He assists banks, non-bank lenders, technology companies, and their vendors with regulatory compliance, litigation, and transactional matters.

Prior to re-joining the firm, Andrew…

Andrew Smith advises clients on retail financial services, data protection, advertising and consumer protection, technology, credit reporting, and e-commerce issues. He assists banks, non-bank lenders, technology companies, and their vendors with regulatory compliance, litigation, and transactional matters.

Prior to re-joining the firm, Andrew served as Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), where he was focused on investigations and enforcement of privacy, data security, financial services, and marketing laws and regulations across a broad range of areas, including fair lending, technology platforms, digital advertising, payments, telemarketing, lead generation, affiliate marketing, consumer reporting, and small business financing. He also oversaw the Bureau’s extensive rulemaking and workshop proceedings, including on endorsement guides, security of financial data, subscription marketing, contact lenses, and children’s privacy. Additionally, he led the FTC’s COVID-19 pandemic-related enforcement and consumer education efforts. In a previous role as Assistant to the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection at the FTC, Andrew led a team of professionals to develop and draft ten rules and six studies under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Andrew represents clients before federal and state agencies—particularly the FTC and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)—in law enforcement and rulemaking proceedings. He regularly advises companies on the requirements of the GLBA, FCRA, DPPA, ECOA, FDCPA, TCPA and TSR, FTC Act, Dodd-Frank Act, and analogous state laws, including state insurance privacy laws and security breach notification requirements.

Photo of Laura Kim Laura Kim

Laura Kim has a proven track record of successfully resolving clients’ most important consumer protection matters before the FTC, State AGs, and the NAD. She is well-known for her insider knowledge of the FTC as well as her practical approach to accomplishing her…

Laura Kim has a proven track record of successfully resolving clients’ most important consumer protection matters before the FTC, State AGs, and the NAD. She is well-known for her insider knowledge of the FTC as well as her practical approach to accomplishing her clients’ objectives.

As chair of Covington’s Advertising & Consumer Protection Investigations practice group, Laura represents corporate and individual clients in investigations before the FTC and State Attorneys General. She also provides pragmatic compliance advice on a wide range of consumer protection issues, including substantiating claims involving generative artificial intelligence, environmental benefits, and “Made in USA.” She counsels brands on emerging issues involving influencers, consumer reviews, AI-generated content, and subscription autorenewals. Laura regularly represents both challengers and advertisers before the NAD, achieving favorable outcomes in matters involving artificial intelligence, influencers, and claim substantiation.

During her twelve-year tenure at the FTC, Laura served as Assistant Director in two divisions of the Bureau of Consumer Protection, Attorney Advisor to Chairman William E. Kovacic, and Chief of Staff to Bureau Director Jessica Rich. She oversaw major rulemakings—including the Green Guides and the Telemarketing Sales Rule—and supervised dozens of investigations and enforcement actions. As Assistant Director in the Division of Enforcement, Laura also supervised compliance monitoring and enforcement proceedings for companies under federal court or Commission order.

Photo of Jehan Patterson Jehan Patterson

Jehan Patterson leverages her extensive experience as a civil litigator and trial attorney in private practice and for the federal government to provide actionable advice that is informed by deep regulatory insight to clients across industries on a wide range of consumer protection…

Jehan Patterson leverages her extensive experience as a civil litigator and trial attorney in private practice and for the federal government to provide actionable advice that is informed by deep regulatory insight to clients across industries on a wide range of consumer protection matters.

Jehan is a member of the Advertising and Consumer Protection Investigations group. She represents corporate and individual clients in consumer protection investigations and litigation by the FTC and state Attorneys General and state financial regulators. She advises clients on consumer protection considerations relating to generative and agentic artificial intelligence, state and federal laws governing autorenewal programs, sustainability and other environmental claims, the FTC’s Made in USA rule, the USDA’s National Organic Program, adtech, and other advertising matters. Jehan also represents clients in complex civil litigation involving consumer protection claims.

Before joining Covington, Jehan was a Senior Litigation Counsel in the Office of Enforcement at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, where she led investigations into numerous providers of consumer financial products and services for violations of federal consumer financial laws and regulations, including the Consumer Financial Protection Act’s prohibition against unfair, deceptive, and abusive acts and practices.

Photo of Alexandra Remick Alexandra Remick

Alexandra Remick is a member of the Advertising and Consumer Protection Investigations Group. Her practice focuses on regulatory and compliance matters related to consumer protection. She has experience advising clients on topics including endorsements, social media influencers, native advertising, automatically renewing subscriptions, consumer…

Alexandra Remick is a member of the Advertising and Consumer Protection Investigations Group. Her practice focuses on regulatory and compliance matters related to consumer protection. She has experience advising clients on topics including endorsements, social media influencers, native advertising, automatically renewing subscriptions, consumer reviews, and claim substantiation in a variety of contexts. She frequently provides advice on specific advertising compliance questions and works with companies on developing internal advertising compliance policies. She has also represented multiple clients in FTC investigations involving consumer protection issues, has conducted regulatory due diligence on multiple transactions, and has drafted comments on multiple rulemakings.

Photo of Analese Bridges Analese Bridges

Analese Bridges is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office and a member of the Data Privacy and Cybersecurity and Advertising and Consumer Protection Practice Groups. She represents and advises clients on a range of cybersecurity, data privacy, and consumer protection issues…

Analese Bridges is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office and a member of the Data Privacy and Cybersecurity and Advertising and Consumer Protection Practice Groups. She represents and advises clients on a range of cybersecurity, data privacy, and consumer protection issues, including cyber and data security incident response and preparedness, cross-border privacy law, government and internal investigations, and regulatory compliance.