The Governor of Oklahoma signed SB 546 into law (OKDPA), which closely tracks the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (“VCDPA”). The law will take effect January 1, 2027.

  • Scope and Applicability. OKDPA applies to controllers and processors that conduct business in Oklahoma or target Oklahoma residents and annually either (a) process or control the personal data of at least 100,000 consumers or (b) derive over 50% of their gross revenue from the sale of personal data and process the personal data of at least 25,000 consumers. The law contains several entity-level exemptions, including for “financial institutions or data” subject to the GLBA, covered entities and business associates governed by HIPAA, nonprofits, and institutions of higher education.
  • Consumer Rights. OKDPA grants consumers a set of rights that closely resemble those found in the VCDPA and other comprehensive privacy laws, including rights of access, deletion, correction, and portability, and rights to opt-out of targeted advertising, sale, or profiling “in furtherance of a decision that produces a legal or similarly significant effect concerning the consumer.”
  • Transparency Requirements. Controllers must provide reasonably clear and accessible privacy notices to consumers that include information about the categories of personal information processed, the purposes of processing that data, the consumer’s rights and how to exercise them, and the categories of data shared with third parties.
  • Sensitive Data. Similar to the VCDPA, controllers must obtain consent to process sensitive data. The scope of sensitive data generally follows the approach taken in the VCDPA and includes data such as personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, religious beliefs, mental or physical health diagnosis, sexual orientation, or citizenship or immigration status, genetic or biometric data that is processed for the purpose of uniquely identifying an individual, personal data collected from a known child, or precise geolocation data.
  • Data minimization and purpose limitation. The law incorporates a VCDPA‑style data minimization and purpose limitation requirement, obligating controllers to limit data collection to what is “adequate, relevant, and reasonably necessary” for purposes disclosed to the individual and to obtain consent to process personal data for purposes that are “neither reasonably necessary to nor compatible with the disclosed purposes for which the personal data is processed.”  
  • Data Protection Assessments. The law requires controllers to conduct data protection assessments for higher‑risk processing activities, including targeted advertising, processing sensitive data, certain profiling activities that present a reasonably foreseeable risk of substantial injury to consumers, and other processing activities involving personal data that present a heightened risk of harm to consumers.
  • Enforcement. Enforcement authority rests with the Oklahoma Attorney General. The bill includes a mandatory 30-day cure period, which does not sunset. The law imposes civil penalties of up to $7,500 per violation.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Lindsey Tonsager Lindsey Tonsager

Lindsey Tonsager is a recognized leader in representing companies before federal and state regulators, and is renowned for advising on minor protection, AI, and state comprehensive privacy laws.

Lindsey chairs the firm’s global Data Privacy and Cybersecurity practice. She advises clients in their…

Lindsey Tonsager is a recognized leader in representing companies before federal and state regulators, and is renowned for advising on minor protection, AI, and state comprehensive privacy laws.

Lindsey chairs the firm’s global Data Privacy and Cybersecurity practice. She advises clients in their strategic and proactive engagement with the Federal Trade Commission, the U.S. Congress, the California Privacy Protection Agency, and State Attorneys General on proposed changes to data protection laws, and regularly represents clients in responding to investigations and enforcement actions involving their privacy and information security practices.

Lindsey’s practice focuses on helping clients launch new products and services that implicate the laws governing the use of artificial intelligence; data processing for robotics, autonomous vehicles, and other connected devices; biometrics; online advertising; the collection of personal information from children, teens, and students online; e-mail marketing; disclosures of video viewing information; and new technologies.

Lindsey also assesses privacy and data security risks in complex corporate transactions where personal data is a critical asset or data processing risks are otherwise material. In light of a dynamic regulatory environment where new state, federal, and international data protection laws are always on the horizon and enforcement priorities are shifting, she focuses on designing risk-based global privacy programs for clients that can keep pace with evolving legal requirements and efficiently leverage the clients’ existing privacy policies and practices. She conducts data protection assessments to benchmark against legal requirements and industry trends and proposes practical risk mitigation measures.

Photo of Jayne Ponder Jayne Ponder

Jayne Ponder provides strategic advice to national and multinational companies across industries on existing and emerging data privacy, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence laws and regulations.

Jayne’s practice focuses on helping clients launch and improve products and services that involve laws governing data privacy…

Jayne Ponder provides strategic advice to national and multinational companies across industries on existing and emerging data privacy, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence laws and regulations.

Jayne’s practice focuses on helping clients launch and improve products and services that involve laws governing data privacy, artificial intelligence, sensitive data and biometrics, marketing and online advertising, connected devices, and social media. For example, Jayne regularly advises clients on the California Consumer Privacy Act, Colorado AI Act, and the developing patchwork of U.S. state data privacy and artificial intelligence laws. She advises clients on drafting consumer notices, designing consent flows and consumer choices, drafting and negotiating commercial terms, building consumer rights processes, and undertaking data protection impact assessments. In addition, she routinely partners with clients on the development of risk-based privacy and artificial intelligence governance programs that reflect the dynamic regulatory environment and incorporate practical mitigation measures.

Jayne routinely represents clients in enforcement actions brought by the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general, particularly in areas related to data privacy, artificial intelligence, advertising, and cybersecurity. Additionally, she helps clients to advance advocacy in rulemaking processes led by federal and state regulators on data privacy, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence topics.

As part of her practice, Jayne also advises companies on cybersecurity incident preparedness and response, including by drafting, revising, and testing incident response plans, conducting cybersecurity gap assessments, engaging vendors, and analyzing obligations under breach notification laws following an incident.

Jayne maintains an active pro bono practice, including assisting small and nonprofit entities with data privacy topics and elder estate planning.