Last week, Tennessee Governor Bill Haslam (R) signed S.B. 2005 into law, amending Tennessee’s breach notification law to broaden the scope of information covered and require quicker notifications of the state’s residents.  Most notably, when the amendments enter into force on July 1, 2016, Tennessee will become the only U.S. state that could require notification of affected individuals following breaches of encrypted information.  The amendments will also require businesses to notify Tennessee residents within 45 days after the business discovers the breach.

All 47 states (plus the District of Columbia) that have enacted breach notification laws currently include an exemption from notification if a breach only discloses encrypted information.  The bill’s sponsor, state Sen. Bill Ketron (R), told the legislature during the bill’s consideration that the change was needed because “encrypted data is now being stolen almost as easily as unencrypted [data].”  However, the bill did not amend the requirement that a breach must “materially compromise[] the security, confidentiality, or integrity of the personal information” subject to the breach, which may protect businesses from having to notify Tennessee residents following breaches of encrypted information where only a remote possibility of harm exists.

Tennessee also joins a growing trend of states that have recently amended their breach notification laws to establish explicit deadlines for notifying affected state residents.  While the 45-day deadline implemented by S.B. 2005 mirrors requirements found in several other states, these amendments go further than many other states by not including any language that extends this 45-day deadline if necessary to investigate a breach or restore the security of the breached system.  The only circumstances under which the deadline can be extended is if law enforcement decides that providing notifications will impede a criminal investigation.

The amendments will also add a safe harbor to Tennessee’s breach notification statute for entities that are subject to HIPAA, in addition to the pre-existing safe harbor for entities subject to the GLBA.  The amendments will enter into force on July 1, 2016.

Tags: breach notification, Cybersecurity, Data Breach, Data Security, encryption, Legislation, Tennessee
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Caleb Skeath Caleb Skeath

Caleb Skeath helps companies manage their most complex and high‑stakes cybersecurity and data security challenges, combining deep regulatory insight, technical fluency, and practical judgment informed by leading incident response matters.

Caleb Skeath advises in‑house legal and security teams on the full lifecycle of…

Caleb Skeath helps companies manage their most complex and high‑stakes cybersecurity and data security challenges, combining deep regulatory insight, technical fluency, and practical judgment informed by leading incident response matters.

Caleb Skeath advises in‑house legal and security teams on the full lifecycle of cybersecurity and privacy risk—from governance and preparedness through incident response, regulatory engagement, and follow‑on litigation. A Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP), he is trusted by clients across highly regulated and technology‑driven sectors to provide clear, practical guidance at moments when legal judgment, technical understanding, and business realities must be aligned.

Caleb has deep experience leading and overseeing responses to complex cybersecurity incidents, including ransomware, data theft and extortion, business email compromise, advanced persistent threats and state-sponsored threat actors, insider threats, and inadvertent data loss. He regularly helps in‑house counsel structure and manage investigations under attorney‑client privilege; coordinate with internal IT, information security, and executive stakeholders; and engage with forensic firms, crisis communications providers, insurers, and law enforcement. A central focus of his practice is advising on notification obligations and strategy, including the application of U.S. federal and state data breach notification laws and requirements along with contractual notification obligations, and helping companies make defensible, risk‑informed decisions about timing, scope, and messaging.

In addition to his work responding to cybersecurity incidents, Caleb works closely with clients’ legal, technical, and compliance teams on cybersecurity governance, regulatory compliance, and pre‑incident planning. He has extensive experience drafting and reviewing cybersecurity policies, incident response plans, and vendor contract provisions; supervising cybersecurity assessments under privilege; and advising on training and tabletop exercises designed to prepare organizations for real‑world incidents. His work frequently involves translating evolving regulatory expectations into actionable guidance for in‑house counsel, including in highly-regulated sectors such as the financial sector (including compliance with NYDFS cybersecurity regulations, the Computer Security Incident Notification Rule, and GLBA guidelines and guidance) and the pharmaceutical and healthcare sector (including compliance with GxP standards, FDA medical device guidance, and HIPAA).

Caleb’s practice also addresses evolving and emerging areas of cybersecurity and data security law, including advising clients on compliance with the Department of Justice’s Data Security Program, CISA‑related security requirements for restricted transactions, and preparation for new regulatory regimes such as the CCPA cybersecurity audit requirements and federal incident reporting obligations. He regularly counsels clients on how artificial intelligence and connected devices intersect with cybersecurity, privacy, and consumer protection risk, and how to support innovation while managing regulatory exposure.

Caleb also has extensive experience helping clients navigate high-stakes cybersecurity-related inquiries from the Federal Trade Commission, state Attorneys General, and other sector-specific regulators, including incident-specific inquiries as well as broader inquiries related to an entity’s cybersecurity practices and the security of product or service offerings. For companies that have entered into cybersecurity-related settlement agreements with regulators, Caleb has helped guide them through compliance with settlement agreement obligations, including navigating required third-party assessments and strategically responding to cybersecurity incidents that can arise while a company is subject to a settlement agreement. Caleb also routinely works hand-in-hand with colleagues in Covington’s class action litigation, commercial litigation, and insurance recovery practices to prepare for and successfully navigate incident-related disputes that can devolve into litigation.

Read more about Caleb SkeathEmail
Show more Show less