Late yesterday the UK ICO issued a new press release and guidance on its plans to enforce the new UK “cookie regulation,” which was enacted by the UK Government to implement the EU’s e-Privacy Directive.  

The new release, which follows previous ICO guidance outlining how businesses might comply with the new rules (see my previous post), declared that the ICO intends to pursue enforcement with a “light touch” and promised that the ICO will not take enforcement actions against businesses using cookies in the UK without user consent for a ‘lead-in’ period of one year.  The new rules, which come into effect today, require websites to obtain consent from users when placing cookies on the user’s devices. The UK Government has interpreted this requirement to entail specific opt-in consent from users, but it has also specified that consent can be obtained after the cookie has been placed on the user’s device, i.e., retroactively.  Businesses will now have a grace period for compliance, but the ICO has warned that those who “do nothing” for this period will find that factor being taken into account when the ICO begins enforcement actions next year.

Christopher Graham, the Information Commissioner, said of the new policy that “I have said all along the new EU rules on cookies are challenging….Browser settings giving individuals more control over cookies will be an important contributor to a solution. But the necessary changes to the technology aren’t there yet.”  The ICO’s new release was accompanied yesterday evening by an open letter from Ed Vaizey, the Minister for Culture, Communications and Creative Industries, in which the Department for Culture, Media and Sport endorsed the ICO’s new approach and explained its take on the new regulation.

Another effect of the new regulation is the granting of new powers to the ICO is that the Commissioner will now have increased powers to impose financial penalties on telecoms and Internet service providers who suffer data breaches without telling the ICO; audit service providers without their consent (although consent will still be sought before this power is used according to new guidance); and impose civil penalties, especially on businesses sending unwanted marketing calls and text message spam.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Dan Cooper Dan Cooper

Daniel Cooper is co-chair of Covington’s Data Privacy and Cyber Security Practice, and advises clients on information technology regulatory and policy issues, particularly data protection, consumer protection, AI, and data security matters. He has over 20 years of experience in the field, representing…

Daniel Cooper is co-chair of Covington’s Data Privacy and Cyber Security Practice, and advises clients on information technology regulatory and policy issues, particularly data protection, consumer protection, AI, and data security matters. He has over 20 years of experience in the field, representing clients in regulatory proceedings before privacy authorities in Europe and counseling them on their global compliance and government affairs strategies. Dan regularly lectures on the topic, and was instrumental in drafting the privacy standards applied in professional sport.

According to Chambers UK, his “level of expertise is second to none, but it’s also equally paired with a keen understanding of our business and direction.” It was noted that “he is very good at calibrating and helping to gauge risk.”

Dan is qualified to practice law in the United States, the United Kingdom, Ireland and Belgium. He has also been appointed to the advisory and expert boards of privacy NGOs and agencies, such as the IAPP’s European Advisory Board, Privacy International and the European security agency, ENISA.