Last week, a district court declined to stay a lawsuit against Google Inc. and group-texting service Slide, Inc. alleging a violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”).  The court found that a related, ongoing proceeding at the Federal Communications Commission relating to the scope of the definitions of “consent” and “automatic telephone dialing system” under the Act did not compel the court to stay the case.  Applying the doctrine of primary jurisdiction, the court concluded that it was as competent to determine the scope of the definitions of these terms as the FCC.

In a separate, but related proceeding, the FCC has requested public comments on the question of whether a company violates the TCPA when it sends a text message to a subscriber’s mobile device to confirm that the subscriber has opted out of receiving text messages ― a practice that is endorsed under the Mobile Marketing Association’s best practices guidelines.  This issue is also the subject of ongoing court proceedings:  there are more than a dozen lawsuits pending against companies for sending such confirmation messages.

The FCC received initial comments yesterday, including comments from industry participants, such as the Mobile Marketing Association and the CTIA―The Wireless Association, urging the Commission to find that one-time, precise opt-out confirmation text messages are not prohibited by the TCPA.  While the National Association of Consumer Advocates argued that even one-time confirmatory text messages should be understood to violate the TCPA, the Future of Privacy Forum agreed with industry commenters, stating that one-time opt-out confirmation text messages help protect individual privacy.  Reply comments are due to the FCC May 15, 2012. 

As we previously have reported, Congress also is considering the need for legislation to amend the TCPA to clarify the scope of limitations under the Act.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Libbie Canter Libbie Canter

Libbie Canter represents a wide variety of multinational companies on managing privacy, cyber security, and artificial intelligence risks, including helping clients with their most complex privacy challenges and the development of governance frameworks and processes to comply with U.S. and global privacy laws.

Libbie Canter represents a wide variety of multinational companies on managing privacy, cyber security, and artificial intelligence risks, including helping clients with their most complex privacy challenges and the development of governance frameworks and processes to comply with U.S. and global privacy laws. She routinely supports clients on their efforts to launch new products and services involving emerging technologies, and she has assisted dozens of clients with their efforts to prepare for and comply with federal and state laws, including the California Consumer Privacy Act, the Colorado AI Act, and other state laws. As part of her practice, she also regularly represents clients in strategic transactions involving personal data, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence risk and represents clients in enforcement and litigation postures.

Libbie represents clients across industries, but she also has deep expertise in advising clients in highly-regulated sectors, including financial services and digital health companies. She counsels these companies — and their technology and advertising partners — on how to address legacy regulatory issues and the cutting edge issues that have emerged with industry innovations and data collaborations. 

Chambers USA 2024 ranks Libbie in Band 3 Nationwide for both Privacy & Data Security: Privacy and Privacy & Data Security: Healthcare. Chambers USA notes, Libbie is “incredibly sharp and really thorough. She can do the nitty-gritty, in-the-weeds legal work incredibly well but she also can think of a bigger-picture business context and help to think through practical solutions.”