Advertising & Marketing

A Washington State Supreme Court decision last spring that construed that state’s Commercial Electronic Mail Act (“CEMA”) to broadly prohibit any misleading information in retailers’ email subject lines has opened the floodgates to similar state spam claims. In the past six months, there have been eight putative class action complaints…

Continue Reading Recent Class Actions Under State Anti-Spam Laws Target Retail Email Marketing Practices and Raise Questions about CAN-SPAM Act Preemption

On August 7, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced a $45 million settlement with online lead generator MediaAlpha, Inc. and its subsidiary QuoteLab, LLC (collectively, “MediaAlpha”), resolving allegations that the companies misled consumers seeking health insurance products. According to the FTC, MediaAlpha tricked consumers into sharing sensitive personal information under the guise of offering health insurance options through their lead generation sites. MediaAlpha allegedly then used that data for abusive telemarketing, including calling numbers on the National Do Not Call Registry. The FTC also alleged that MediaAlpha auctioned off consumers’ information to third-party lead generators and telemarketers, who similarly used that data to make illegal telemarketing calls.Continue Reading FTC Takes Aim at Online Lead Generator

In July, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced that telemedicine company NextMed agreed to pay $150,000 to settle charges that it deceptively advertised its GLP-1 weight-loss membership programs to consumers. The FTC’s complaint alleged a host of deceptive practices under Sections 5 and 12 of the FTC Act, including making unsubstantiated weight-loss claims, disseminating fake testimonials and consumer reviews, failing to adequately disclose the terms of its memberships, and purposefully making it difficult for consumers to cancel their memberships.Continue Reading FTC Targets Weight-Loss Membership Program

With the Trump administration’s renewed focus on American manufacturing, FTC Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson’s recent declaration that July 2025 is “Made in the USA” Month appears to signal a renewed emphasis on Made in USA enforcement.  The FTC has a long history of scrutinizing these claims and the more recently-issued Made in USA Rule sets strict compliance standards with the threat of significant monetary penalties for non-compliance.  And while Chairman Ferguson’s statement nods to the importance of preventing deception in this area, it emphasizes that advertisers should be making Made in USA claims whenever they are appropriate.Continue Reading FTC Declares July as “Made in the USA” Month

This year, state lawmakers have introduced over a dozen bills to regulate “surveillance,” “personalized,” or “dynamic” pricing.  Although many of these proposals have failed as 2025 state legislative sessions come to a close, lawmakers in New York, California, and a handful of other states are moving forward with a range…

Continue Reading State Legislatures Advance Surveillance Pricing Regulations

Personalized advertising and pricing are increasingly common online practices, and prompt discussions about fairness and consumer rights in the EU.  This post examines how these practices are regulated under EU consumer protection law, and what we anticipate from the forthcoming Digital Fairness Act (DFA).  We also consider how data protection rules—such as the GDPR—interact with consumer protection laws.

This is the third post in our series on the DFA—a draft EU law currently being prepared by the European Commission and expected to be published in mid-2026.  Previous posts covered influencer marketing and AI chatbots in consumer interactions.Continue Reading Digital Fairness Act Series — Topic 3: Personalized Advertising and Pricing

On May 9, 2025, the FTC announced that it is deferring the compliance deadline for the Negative Option Rule by 60 days to July 14.  This announcement came five days before the original compliance date for the majority of the Rule’s provisions.  All three Commissioners voted in favor of the deferral.Continue Reading FTC Delays Negative Option Rule Compliance Date to July 14

On March 18, 2025, the Norwegian Consumer Council asked the Norwegian Supervisory Authority to investigate a payment app provider for using consumers’ purchase history for targeted advertising. Continue Reading Watchdog to Investigate Mobile Payment Provider Over Its Use of Purchase History for Targeted Advertising

On October 16, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced a final “click-to-cancel” rule that amends the previous Negative Option Rule to “make it as easy for consumers to cancel their enrollment as it was to sign up.” The Rule also imposes extensive requirements regarding misrepresentations, disclosures, and consent, among others. Most of the provisions will go into effect 180 days after publication in the Federal Register. As of today, the final rule has not yet been published. This final rule is the culmination of a five-year proceeding including the FTC’s issuance of a notice of proposed rulemaking (“NPRM”) in March 2023 and an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking in October 2019. We previously analyzed the proposed rule presented in the NPRM.Continue Reading FTC Issues Final “Click-to-Cancel” Rule

On August 14, the FTC announced a final rule that, according to the FTC, is intended to “combat fake reviews and testimonials.”  The rule will go into effect on October 21, 2024.  This final rule is the culmination of the FTC’s issuance of an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM)…

Continue Reading FTC Issues Final Rule on Reviews and Testimonials