Many businesses use customer support software that may include call recording features to help ensure a better customer service experience. A California federal court dismissed a wiretapping lawsuit filed against a software company offering this software tool (TalkDesk), holding that TalkDesk’s alleged recording of customers’ conversations with clothing retailers “is simply not private or personal enough to confer [Article III] standing.” See Lien, et al., v. Talkdesk, Inc., No. 24-CV-06467-VC, 2025 WL 551664 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2025).Continue Reading Recording of Customer Service Call “Not Private or Personal Enough” to Confer Article III Standing
Privacy & Data Security
Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of CIPA and Wiretap Act Claims Against Celebrity Platform
A fan of celebrity LL Cool J filed a wiretapping suit against Community.com (“Community”), claiming that Community accessed her text message to LL Cool J in violation of the federal Wiretap Act and the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”). In an unpublished opinion highlighting that Section 632 of CIPA does not protect communications that are by nature a recorded medium, the Ninth Circuit affirmed dismissal of the plaintiff’s claims. See Boulton v. Community.com, Inc., No. 23-3145, 2025 WL 314813 (9th Cir. Jan. 28, 2025).Continue Reading Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of CIPA and Wiretap Act Claims Against Celebrity Platform
CJEU Clarifies GDPR Rights on Automated Decision-Making and Trade Secrets
On February 27, 2025, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) issued a significant decision on the right of data subjects to request access to their personal data under Article 15 GDPR, specifically as it relates to automated decision-making and striking an appropriate balance between informing data subjects and protecting trade secrets (Case C‑203/22).Continue Reading CJEU Clarifies GDPR Rights on Automated Decision-Making and Trade Secrets
Website Wiretapping Litigation: Recent Decisions and Developments
Website analytics and advertising tools, such as pixels, are regularly targeted in lawsuits brought under various wiretap laws, including the federal Wiretap Act and the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”). We cover significant developments and trends in website wiretapping lawsuits on Inside Class Actions. Over the last several months, we have featured posts discussing an important decision from Massachusetts’ highest court about the availability of website wiretap suits under Massachusetts law, an opinion from a California court about a new “pen register” theory under CIPA, and more. These posts, and other highlights, include the following:Continue Reading Website Wiretapping Litigation: Recent Decisions and Developments
New Jersey Court Applies CIPA’s Party Exception to Pixel Wiretap Complaint
Last month, a New Jersey federal judge applied Third Circuit precedent to hold that the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”) does not impose liability for commonplace use of website marketing/analytics pixels under the well-established party exception. Cole v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc., 2025 WL 88703 (D.N.J. Jan. 14, 2025).Continue Reading New Jersey Court Applies CIPA’s Party Exception to Pixel Wiretap Complaint
U.S. Senate Passes SHIELD Act to Criminalize Distribution of Private Intimate Images Online
On July 10, 2024, the U.S. Senate passed the Stopping Harmful Image Exploitation and Limiting Distribution (“SHIELD”) Act, which would criminalize the distribution of private sexually explicit or nude images online. Continue Reading U.S. Senate Passes SHIELD Act to Criminalize Distribution of Private Intimate Images Online
CNIL Opens Public Consultation on Its Standards for Processing Health Data
On May 16, 2024, the CNIL launched a public consultation on all of its health data standards. Interested stakeholders are encouraged to participate by completing a questionnaire (available in French here) by July 12, 2024.
French law has specific requirements for the processing of health data. In particular, it…
Continue Reading CNIL Opens Public Consultation on Its Standards for Processing Health DataFrance Publishes Updated Certification Standard for the Hosting of Health Data
The French Public Health Code requires that certain service providers hosting health data hold a specific “HDS” certification. In order to obtain this certification, providers must comply with the requirements set out in the “HDS” certification standard. On May 16, 2024, France officially published an updated version of this “HDS”…
Continue Reading France Publishes Updated Certification Standard for the Hosting of Health DataChina Eases Restrictions on Cross-Border Data Flows
After nearly six months since the initial draft was issued for public comments on September 28, 2023 (see here for our previous alert on that development), on March 22, 2024, the Cyberspace Administration of China (“CAC”) issued the final version of the Provisions on Promoting and Standardizing Cross-Border Data Flows (促进和规范数据跨境流动规定) ( “Provisions”) (Chinese version available here). The Provisions take effect immediately.
The newly finalized Provisions introduce significant changes to China’s existing cross-border data transfer regime. These changes primarily involve exemptions from the previously mandated transfer mechanisms outlined in the Personal Information Protection Law (“PIPL”) and its implementing regulations. Such mechanisms included undergoing a government-led security assessment, entering into a standardized contract, or obtaining personal information protection certification. As a result, many companies that previously faced these requirements may now be exempt, easing their compliance burden for cross-border data transfers. Importantly, the Provisions take precedence over any conflicting provisions within PIPL’s implementing regulations, including the Measures on the Standard Contract for Cross-Border Transfer of Personal Information and the Measures for Security Assessment of Cross-Border Data Transfer.Continue Reading China Eases Restrictions on Cross-Border Data Flows
EDPB Issues Draft Guidelines on Technical Scope of ePrivacy Directive Rules for Storage and Access
On November 16, 2023, the European Data Protection Board (“EDPB”) issued draft Guidelines 2/2023 on Technical Scope of Art. 5(3) of ePrivacy Directive (“Guidelines”). Article 5(3) is the provision that requires consent before storing or accessing information on an end user’s device. Over the years it has become known as the “cookie rule,” but it is technology-agnostic. The Guidelines expand upon guidance issued by the Article 29 Working Group in 2014, and are intended to clarify when the requirement applies to new tracking methods. The Guidelines are open to public consultation through December 28, 2023.
The Guidelines identify and explain the four key elements that trigger the obligation to obtain opt-in consent under Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive (“ePD”). The Guidelines set forth an extremely broad interpretation of what constitutes “storing” and “accessing” information on a user’s device that arguably goes beyond the plain meaning of these terms. This interpretation is likely to be relevant for companies considering how to approach the discontinuation of third-party cookies on many browsers. Continue Reading EDPB Issues Draft Guidelines on Technical Scope of ePrivacy Directive Rules for Storage and Access