On June 10, 2025, the Finnish Data Protection Ombudsman published a decision (in FI) where it found that the processing of personal data for enforcing parking violations was unlawful because the enforcement mechanism was not described in the parking rental agreement.  This recent decision is a striking example of how data protection and consumer protection law are increasingly intertwined.  The case demonstrates that the way in which customer services—and any related enforcement mechanisms for non-performance—are described in contracts is not just a matter of consumer transparency, but a legal requirement for the lawful processing of personal data under Article 6(1)(b) of the GDPR (“processing [that] is necessary for the performance of a contract”).

Background

In this case, persons who violated certain applicable rules for parking in a designated area (e.g., did not display a badge indicating their right to park), set out in a property rental agreement, faced collection actions for alleged parking violations from a third-party debt collection company.  However, the rental agreement made no mention of such enforcement of the rules or any requirement to display a parking permit.  Despite this, the debt collection agency processed the renter’s personal data to pursue contested parking fines.

Upon review, the Data Protection Ombudsman determined that the absence of any contractual provision pertaining to the enforcement of the parking rules in the rental agreement meant there was no lawful basis for processing the renter’s personal data for enforcement purposes.  In this case, the third-party debt collection company may not rely on Article 6(1)(b) of the GDPR (“processing [that] is necessary for the performance of a contract to which the data subject is party”).  From a contract law perspective, the agreement between the party renting out the parking spaces and the third-party debt collection company did not bind individual renters, as the terms were not referenced in the latter’s rental agreement.

Why Service Descriptions Matter in Contracts

While the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requires a lawful basis for personal data processing, EU consumer law—specifically the Consumer Rights Directive (CRD) and the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (UCPD)—requires that consumers receive clear, comprehensive information about the characteristics of products and services before entering into a contract.  This includes details on enforcement mechanisms, such as fines or collection actions, if they are part of the service.

  • The CRD (Directive 2011/83/EU) obliges traders to inform consumers about the main characteristics of services and any conditions for enforcement or termination before the contract is concluded.
  • The UCPD (Directive 2005/29/EC) prohibits misleading omissions, ensuring consumers are not left in the dark about key contract features.

If enforcement mechanisms are not clearly described and agreed upon, not only may the consumer’s right to information be infringed, but any data processing for enforcement purposes may lack a lawful basis under the GDPR.

Implications for Service Providers

For service providers, the key takeaways are:

  • Review and update contract templates to ensure that all enforcement mechanisms and data processing purposes for fulfilling and enforcing the contract are clearly described.
  • Before processing personal data with the intention of enforcing contractual terms that have been breached or other purposes, verify that the contract with the consumer expressly covers these activities.

*              *              *

Covington & Burling continues to monitor and advise companies on navigating EU data protection law and its intersection with EU consumer protection law.  Please do reach out if you need assistance in these areas.

(This blog post was written with the contribution of Alberto Vogel.)

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Dan Cooper Dan Cooper

Daniel Cooper is co-chair of Covington’s Data Privacy and Cyber Security Practice, and advises clients on information technology regulatory and policy issues, particularly data protection, consumer protection, AI, and data security matters. He has over 20 years of experience in the field, representing…

Daniel Cooper is co-chair of Covington’s Data Privacy and Cyber Security Practice, and advises clients on information technology regulatory and policy issues, particularly data protection, consumer protection, AI, and data security matters. He has over 20 years of experience in the field, representing clients in regulatory proceedings before privacy authorities in Europe and counseling them on their global compliance and government affairs strategies. Dan regularly lectures on the topic, and was instrumental in drafting the privacy standards applied in professional sport.

According to Chambers UK, his “level of expertise is second to none, but it’s also equally paired with a keen understanding of our business and direction.” It was noted that “he is very good at calibrating and helping to gauge risk.”

Dan is qualified to practice law in the United States, the United Kingdom, Ireland and Belgium. He has also been appointed to the advisory and expert boards of privacy NGOs and agencies, such as the IAPP’s European Advisory Board, Privacy International and the European security agency, ENISA.

Photo of Anna Sophia Oberschelp de Meneses Anna Sophia Oberschelp de Meneses

I advise companies across the EU on technology laws, with a focus on data protection, cybersecurity, and current consumer protection laws. I help businesses navigate complex regulations like the GDPR, AI Act, Digital Services Act, Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, and the upcoming Digital…

I advise companies across the EU on technology laws, with a focus on data protection, cybersecurity, and current consumer protection laws. I help businesses navigate complex regulations like the GDPR, AI Act, Digital Services Act, Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, and the upcoming Digital Fairness Act, turning legal requirements into practical, business-friendly solutions.

In data protection, I support tailored GDPR compliance, international data transfers, and privacy-conscious marketing. On cybersecurity, I guide clients through risk assessments, incident response, and evolving laws such as NIS2 and the Cyber Resilience Act. Regarding consumer protection, I advise on existing laws to help businesses revise their terms and conditions for compliance and review online interfaces to ensure all mandatory consumer information is clearly provided, tackling issues like dark patterns and unfair contract clauses.

Fluent in multiple languages and experienced across borders, I’m passionate about helping clients embed compliance into their operations and thrive in the fast-changing digital landscape.