The UK’s data protection regulator, the Information Commissioner’s Office (“ICO”), has imposed a fine of £350,000 on Prodial Ltd (“Prodial”) for making over 46 million unsolicited automated telephone calls to generate leads in relation to payment protection insurance refunds.  This is the highest fine issued by the ICO to date.

The ICO investigated the marketing activities of Prodial after receiving over 1,100 complaints in the space of seven months.  Prodial was found to have breached the UK’s Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003, as amended (“PECR”), by making automated marketing calls — i.e., calls made by an automated dialling system that plays a recorded message — to people without their consent.

The ICO has the authority, under section 55(1) of the Data Protection Act 1998, to issue fines of up to £500,000 for serious contraventions of PECR.  The conditions are: (a) there has been a “serious contravention” of PECR; (b) the contravention is likely to cause “substantial damage or substantial distress”; and (c) the contravention was deliberate, or the person knew or ought to have known that there was a risk the contravention would occur and that it would cause substantial damage or substantial distress but failed to take reasonable steps to prevent it.

The ICO justified its record-breaking fine in this case on the basis that:

  • The contravention of PECR was clearly serious given the sheer number of automated marketing calls made within a short time period and the number of complaints received by the ICO.  Prodial made repeat calls to people, sometimes even during the same day, and failed at times to allow the recipients of the calls to speak to a person or to opt-out from subsequent calls. In addition, Prodial was not identified as the instigator of the calls, making it hard for people to report the company to the ICO.
  • Prodial deliberately engaged in a marketing campaign on a massive scale, even if it did not deliberately intend to cause distress.  According to the ICO’s press release, the company was aware that it was acting in breach of the law, as once the ICO become involved, the company was placed into voluntary liquidation by one of its directors.
  • The monetary penalty in the case was appropriate to encourage compliance with PECR and to “send a clear message to other firms that this type of law-breaking will not pay.”  The ICO also considered the fact that Prodial obtained a commercial advantage from its breach of the law by selling the personal data collected during the calls to claims management companies and hence potentially producing a turnover of almost £1 million from the marketing campaign.

The ICO’s decision in this case is consistent with the regulator’s recent trend for taking a strict stance against deliberate and clear violations of the law and for going after the worst offenders.  Only last October the ICO imposed a hefty fine of £200,000 on a company making automated marketing calls in breach of the UK regulations, as we reported here.  The ICO has also recently handed a stop order on a company co-ordinating millions of unsolicited automated calls, requiring the company to stop or face legal action, and warning other nuisance callers that “there’s nowhere to hide” (see ICO news report here).

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Mark Young Mark Young

Mark Young is an experienced tech regulatory lawyer and a vice-chair of Covington’s Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice Group. He advises major global companies on their most challenging data privacy compliance matters and investigations. Mark also leads on EMEA cybersecurity matters at the…

Mark Young is an experienced tech regulatory lawyer and a vice-chair of Covington’s Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice Group. He advises major global companies on their most challenging data privacy compliance matters and investigations. Mark also leads on EMEA cybersecurity matters at the firm. In these contexts, he has worked closely with some of the world’s leading technology and life sciences companies and other multinationals.

Mark has been recognized for several years in Chambers UK as “a trusted adviser – practical, results-oriented and an expert in the field;” “fast, thorough and responsive;” “extremely pragmatic in advice on risk;” “provides thoughtful, strategic guidance and is a pleasure to work with;” and has “great insight into the regulators.” According to the most recent edition (2024), “He’s extremely technologically sophisticated and advises on true issues of first impression, particularly in the field of AI.”

Drawing on over 15 years of experience, Mark specializes in:

  • Advising on potential exposure under GDPR and international data privacy laws in relation to innovative products and services that involve cutting-edge technology, e.g., AI, biometric data, and connected devices.
  • Providing practical guidance on novel uses of personal data, responding to individuals exercising rights, and data transfers, including advising on Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs) and compliance challenges following Brexit and Schrems II.
  • Helping clients respond to investigations by data protection regulators in the UK, EU and globally, and advising on potential follow-on litigation risks.
  • Counseling ad networks (demand and supply side), retailers, and other adtech companies on data privacy compliance relating to programmatic advertising, and providing strategic advice on complaints and claims in a range of jurisdictions.
  • Advising life sciences companies on industry-specific data privacy issues, including:
    • clinical trials and pharmacovigilance;
    • digital health products and services; and
    • engagement with healthcare professionals and marketing programs.
  • International conflict of law issues relating to white collar investigations and data privacy compliance (collecting data from employees and others, international transfers, etc.).
  • Advising various clients on the EU NIS2 Directive and UK NIS regulations and other cybersecurity-related regulations, particularly (i) cloud computing service providers, online marketplaces, social media networks, and other digital infrastructure and service providers, and (ii) medical device and pharma companies, and other manufacturers.
  • Helping a broad range of organizations prepare for and respond to cybersecurity incidents, including personal data breaches, IP and trade secret theft, ransomware, insider threats, supply chain incidents, and state-sponsored attacks. Mark’s incident response expertise includes:
    • supervising technical investigations and providing updates to company boards and leaders;
    • advising on PR and related legal risks following an incident;
    • engaging with law enforcement and government agencies; and
    • advising on notification obligations and other legal risks, and representing clients before regulators around the world.
  • Advising clients on risks and potential liabilities in relation to corporate transactions, especially involving companies that process significant volumes of personal data (e.g., in the adtech, digital identity/anti-fraud, and social network sectors.)
  • Providing strategic advice and advocacy on a range of UK and EU technology law reform issues including data privacy, cybersecurity, ecommerce, eID and trust services, and software-related proposals.
  • Representing clients in connection with references to the Court of Justice of the EU.