AI chatbots are transforming how businesses handle consumer inquiries and complaints, offering speed and availability that traditional channels often cannot match.  However, the European Commission’s recent Digital Fairness Act Fitness Check has spotlighted a gap: EU consumers currently lack a cross-sectoral right to demand human contact when interacting with AI chatbots in business-to-consumer settings.  It is still unclear whether and how the European Commission is proposing to address this.  The Digital Fairness Act could do so, but the Commission’s proposal is only planned to be published in the 3rd quarter of 2026.  This post highlights key consumer protection considerations for companies deploying AI chatbots in the EU market.

AI Chatbots Cannot Be the Only Contact Channel

Under EU law–particularly the Consumer Rights Directive (“CRD”) and the eCommerce Directive–consumers must have access to traditional communication channels such as the trader’s postal address, telephone number, and email address.  The Court of Justice of the EU has made clear that consumers must be able to contact traders directly, quickly, and effectively (Case C-649/17).  While chatbots can assist, they cannot replace mandatory human contact options.

AI Chatbots as Supplementary Communication Channels

The CRD requires traders to disclose their primary contact details before concluding a contract, but does not prohibit offering AI chatbots as additional communication tools.  Where chatbots enable consumers to retain durable records of their interactions – including timestamps – traders should inform consumers about that.  Durable records are defined as information stored in a medium accessible and unalterable for future reference, such as emails or downloadable files.

In any event, certain communications, such as the acknowledgment of a consumer’s right of withdrawal, must be provided in a “durable medium,” ensuring consumers have a stable and accessible record of important contractual information.

Human Oversight and the Right to Human Intervention

EU legislation increasingly emphasizes the importance of human oversight of AI systems, especially high-risk ones:

  • The AI Act will, from August 2026, require human oversight of certain high-risk AI systems, such as tools used to determine eligibility for essential public services (e.g., healthcare or social benefits), credit scoring systems affecting access to loans, or AI used in recruitment processes to automatically screen candidates.
  • Sector-specific laws in financial services, including the Consumer Credit Directive and the Distance Marketing Directive, guarantee consumers the right to human intervention when dealing with automated systems like chatbots.
  • The GDPR protects individuals from decisions based solely on automated processing that produce legal or similarly significant effects, granting a right to human review.

Additional Considerations for Businesses

  • AI Transparency and User Rights.  Under the AI Act, starting in August 2026, AI providers must inform users when they interact with AI unless it is obvious.  AI-generated content must be clearly labeled in a machine-readable way, except for minor edits.  Individuals affected by high-risk AI decisions impacting their rights have the right to clear explanations.  These rules ensure transparency, accountability, and protection of users.
  • Rankings and Ratings.  Under the CRD, companies must clearly disclose the main factors that determine the ranking of offers provided by AI chatbots.  AI chatbots can be used to search for products, services, or information, presenting results based on algorithms that influence consumer choices.  The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (“UCPD”) prohibits misleading or manipulated reviews and ratings and requires them to be genuine and fairly presented.  These rules protect consumers from deception and promote transparency and fairness, also in AI-driven search results.
  • Accessibility and Non-Discrimination.  Deployers of chatbots must also consider accessibility for all consumers, including those with disabilities, in line with the European Accessibility Act (which starts applying in June 2025) and the avoidance of discriminatory practices based on age, gender, ethnicity, or digital literacy.
  • Data Protection and Privacy.  Chatbot interactions must comply with GDPR requirements, including transparency about data collection and processing, purpose limitation, and data security.
  • Liability and Accountability.  Traders remain fully responsible for all communications with consumers, including those conducted through AI chatbots.  Businesses should ensure that chatbot responses are accurate.  They can be held accountable and liable for any misleading or incorrect information provoded by a chatbot, for example under the new Product Liability Directive, which applies as of December 2026.
  • Cross-Border and Multilingual Considerations.  Traders should clearly specify the languages in which their chatbots can operate.  If automatic translation is used they should inform consumers about the expected level of translation accuracy to manage consumer expectations.  Under the UCPD, if a trader communicates with a consumer in a language other than the official language of their country before a purchase, their AI chatbots should provide after-sales service in that same language, unless otherwise stated.

*             *             *

Covington & Burling continues to monitor these developments closely and advises companies on navigating EU consumer protection law in the age of AI.  Compliance with these evolving requirements will not only meet regulatory demands but also build consumer trust in an increasingly digital marketplace.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Anna Sophia Oberschelp de Meneses Anna Sophia Oberschelp de Meneses

I advise companies across the EU on technology laws, with a focus on data protection, cybersecurity, and current consumer protection laws. I help businesses navigate complex regulations like the GDPR, AI Act, Digital Services Act, Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, and the upcoming Digital…

I advise companies across the EU on technology laws, with a focus on data protection, cybersecurity, and current consumer protection laws. I help businesses navigate complex regulations like the GDPR, AI Act, Digital Services Act, Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, and the upcoming Digital Fairness Act, turning legal requirements into practical, business-friendly solutions.

In data protection, I support tailored GDPR compliance, international data transfers, and privacy-conscious marketing. On cybersecurity, I guide clients through risk assessments, incident response, and evolving laws such as NIS2 and the Cyber Resilience Act. Regarding consumer protection, I advise on existing laws to help businesses revise their terms and conditions for compliance and review online interfaces to ensure all mandatory consumer information is clearly provided, tackling issues like dark patterns and unfair contract clauses.

Fluent in multiple languages and experienced across borders, I’m passionate about helping clients embed compliance into their operations and thrive in the fast-changing digital landscape.

Photo of Dan Cooper Dan Cooper

Daniel Cooper is co-chair of Covington’s Data Privacy and Cyber Security Practice, and advises clients on information technology regulatory and policy issues, particularly data protection, consumer protection, AI, and data security matters. He has over 20 years of experience in the field, representing…

Daniel Cooper is co-chair of Covington’s Data Privacy and Cyber Security Practice, and advises clients on information technology regulatory and policy issues, particularly data protection, consumer protection, AI, and data security matters. He has over 20 years of experience in the field, representing clients in regulatory proceedings before privacy authorities in Europe and counseling them on their global compliance and government affairs strategies. Dan regularly lectures on the topic, and was instrumental in drafting the privacy standards applied in professional sport.

According to Chambers UK, his “level of expertise is second to none, but it’s also equally paired with a keen understanding of our business and direction.” It was noted that “he is very good at calibrating and helping to gauge risk.”

Dan is qualified to practice law in the United States, the United Kingdom, Ireland and Belgium. He has also been appointed to the advisory and expert boards of privacy NGOs and agencies, such as the IAPP’s European Advisory Board, Privacy International and the European security agency, ENISA.

Photo of Kristof Van Quathem Kristof Van Quathem

Kristof Van Quathem advises clients on information technology matters and policy, with a focus on data protection, cybercrime and various EU data-related initiatives, such as the Data Act, the AI Act and EHDS.

Kristof has been specializing in this area for over twenty…

Kristof Van Quathem advises clients on information technology matters and policy, with a focus on data protection, cybercrime and various EU data-related initiatives, such as the Data Act, the AI Act and EHDS.

Kristof has been specializing in this area for over twenty years and developed particular experience in the life science and information technology sectors. He counsels clients on government affairs strategies concerning EU lawmaking and their compliance with applicable regulatory frameworks, and has represented clients in non-contentious and contentious matters before data protection authorities, national courts and the Court of the Justice of the EU.

Kristof is admitted to practice in Belgium.

Photo of Sam Jungyun Choi Sam Jungyun Choi

Recognized by Law.com International as a Rising Star (2023), Sam Jungyun Choi is an associate in the technology regulatory group in Brussels. She advises leading multinationals on European and UK data protection law and new regulations and policy relating to innovative technologies, such…

Recognized by Law.com International as a Rising Star (2023), Sam Jungyun Choi is an associate in the technology regulatory group in Brussels. She advises leading multinationals on European and UK data protection law and new regulations and policy relating to innovative technologies, such as AI, digital health, and autonomous vehicles.

Sam is an expert on the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the UK Data Protection Act, having advised on these laws since they started to apply. In recent years, her work has evolved to include advising companies on new data and digital laws in the EU, including the AI Act, Data Act and the Digital Services Act.

Sam’s practice includes advising on regulatory, compliance and policy issues that affect leading companies in the technology, life sciences and gaming companies on laws relating to privacy and data protection, digital services and AI. She advises clients on designing of new products and services, preparing privacy documentation, and developing data and AI governance programs. She also advises clients on matters relating to children’s privacy and policy initiatives relating to online safety.