Photo of Tom Cusworth

Tom Cusworth

Tom Cusworth is a senior litigation associate with expertise in complex contractual and fraud disputes. He advises clients on jurisdictional and immunity issues, as well as contentious issues relating to data, AI and product liability, and has significant experience with complex fraud matters and international asset recovery, including freezing orders and enforcement of arbitral awards and judgments in the UK and other jurisdictions.

Tom is experienced in high-profile English High Court litigation, across the Business and Property Courts and the Administrative Court, and commercial arbitration under LCIA, ICC and SIAC rules. He advises corporate clients in the technology, life sciences, food and drug, energy, and financial services sectors, as well as individual clients.

Tom is the author of the PLC practice note on state immunity, "Sovereign immunity: state immunity from adjudication and enforcement."

Contact:Read more about Tom CusworthEmail

On 9 October 2023, the European Parliament’s Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee (IMCO) and Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI) agreed revised wording to amend the European Commission’s (the “EC”) proposed new Product Liability Directive (the “Directive”). The vote was passed with 33 votes in favour to 2 against. If adopted, the Directive will replace the existing (almost 40-year old) Directive 85/374/EEC on Liability for Defective Products, which imposes a form of strict liability on product manufacturers for harm caused by their defective products.Continue Reading EU Legislative Update on the New Product Liability Directive

The English High Court has recently awarded damages in a data privacy case, with two features of particular interest.  First, the nature of the claim is more reminiscent of a claim in defamation than for data privacy breaches, which is a development in the use of data protection legislation.  Secondly, the damages awarded (perhaps influenced by the nature of the case) were unusually high for a data privacy case.

The decision highlights an unusual use of data protection in English law, as a freestanding form of quasi-defamation claim, as the claimants sought damages for reputational harm (as well as distress) solely under the Data Protection Act 1998 (the “DPA”, since replaced by the Data Protection Act 2018, which implemented the General Data Protection Regulation ((EU) 2016/679) (GDPR) in the UK) rather than in a libel or defamation claim, or in parallel with such a claim.  It also sets a potentially unhelpful precedent by awarding two of the claimants £18,000 each for inaccurate processing of their personal data, an amount that is significantly higher than has been awarded in other data protection cases brought under the DPA.  If such awards were to be made in the context of a class action, the potential liability for data controllers could be significant.
Continue Reading English High Court Awards Damages for Quasi-Defamation Data Claim