Comments

As part of the White House’s ongoing review of “big data” and its implications for privacy, the economy, and public policy, the Office of Science and Technology Policy (“OSTP”) has announced that it is requesting comments from the public on several key issues.

OSTP’s Request for Information asks commenters to consider the following questions:

  1. What are the public policy implications of the collection, storage, analysis, and use of big data?  For example, do the current U.S. policy framework and privacy proposals for protecting consumer privacy and government use of data adequately address issues raised by big data analytics?
  2. What types of uses of big data could measurably improve outcomes or productivity with further government action, funding, or research?  What types of uses of big data raise the most public policy concerns?  Are there specific sectors or types of uses that should receive more government and/or public attention?
  3. What technological trends or key technologies will affect the collection, storage, analysis and use of big data?  Are there particularly promising technologies or new practices for safeguarding privacy while enabling effective uses of big data?
  4. How should the policy frameworks or regulations for handling big data differ between the government and the private sector?  Please be specific as to the type of entity and type of use (e.g., law enforcement, government services, commercial, academic research, etc.).
  5. What issues are raised by the use of big data across jurisdictions, such as the adequacy of current international laws, regulations, or norms?

The deadline for responses is March 31.  The full Request for Information, including details on submitting responses, is available here.

Continue Reading White House Seeks Public Comment on Implications of Big Data

By Dan Cooper and Colin Warriner

On 10 October 2013, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled that finding the owners of an online news portal liable for offensive comments posted by its users did not violate their right to freedom of expression.  Reactions to the ruling (which may still be appealed to the Grand Chamber of the Court) have largely focused on the fact that the ECHR cited the anonymity of the commentators as a factor in its decision; many headlines have sounded the death knell for online anonymity.  However, the impact of the decision might not be so drastic.  

Delfi AS owns one of Estonia’s largest news websites.  In January 2006, it published an article about changes to a ferry company’s route that attracted many offensive and threatening comments about the ferry owner from users of the site.  The ferry owner successfully sued Delfi for defamation, and the Estonian court awarded it 5,000 kroons (€320).  The Estonian Supreme Court dismissed Delfi’s appeal in 2009, so Delfi went to the ECHR to complain that being held liable for its readers’ comments violated its freedom of expression under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights.Continue Reading European Court of Human Rights holds website liable for offensive anonymous comments

Earlier today, the Federal Trade Commission announced a two-week extension for submitting comments on the FTC’s latest proposed revisions to the rule implementing the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”).  In place of the original September 10, 2012, deadline, comments will now be accepted until September 24, 2012.

The FTC granted the extension after sixteen