On March 20, 2025, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) ruled on the fairness, under EU consumer protection law, of a contractual clause allocating a percentage of an athlete’s income to a professional services provider (Case C‑365/23 [Arce]). This ruling sets an important precedent and strengthens the protection afforded by consumer protection law to minors who enter into professional service contracts, whether in sport or elsewhere.
Continue Reading CJEU Rules on Fairness of Remuneration Clause in Sports Contract
Kristof Van Quathem
Kristof Van Quathem advises clients on information technology matters and policy, with a focus on data protection, cybercrime and various EU data-related initiatives, such as the Data Act, the AI Act and EHDS.
Kristof has been specializing in this area for over twenty years and developed particular experience in the life science and information technology sectors. He counsels clients on government affairs strategies concerning EU lawmaking and their compliance with applicable regulatory frameworks, and has represented clients in non-contentious and contentious matters before data protection authorities, national courts and the Court of the Justice of the EU.
Kristof is admitted to practice in Belgium.
Consumer Watchdogs Turn Their Attention to the Online Gaming Industry
On March 21, 2025, the European Commission announced that the Consumer Protection Cooperation Network (“CPC-N”) had initiated enforcement proceedings against an online gaming company, for allegedly violating EU consumer protection laws and engaging in practices that could pose a particular risk to children. The gaming company now has one month to propose commitments to remedy the consumer law violations identified by the CPC-N. Concurrently, the CPC-N published guidelines to promote transparency and fairness in the online gaming industry’s use of virtual currencies.
Continue Reading Consumer Watchdogs Turn Their Attention to the Online Gaming IndustryGerman SA Checks Whether Online Retailers Allow Consumers to Make Purchases Without Creating an Account
In January 2025, the German Supervisory Authority of Hamburg (“HSA”) examined the practices of online retailers based in Hamburg as to whether they allowed consumers to make purchases without creating a user account. This was mentioned in a press release issued by the HSA regarding a ruling by the Hamburg Higher Regional Court confirming a HSA’s decision that online retailers may, in certain circumstances, require consumers to create a user account. This, in turn, follows the guidance published by the German supervisory authorities (“German SAs”) in 2022 (in German), which stated that online retailers generally may not require consumers to create a user account in order to make a purchase.
Continue Reading German SA Checks Whether Online Retailers Allow Consumers to Make Purchases Without Creating an AccountCJEU Rules on Right of Rectification of Gender Identity
On March 13, 2025, the Court of Justice of the EU (“CJEU”) ruled that the right of rectification (in Article 16 GDPR) requires a national authority to correct a person’s gender identity, where it is shown to be inaccurate (Case C‑247/23 [Deldits]). The authority, however, may require that person to provide relevant and sufficient evidence to establish that the information concerning their gender is inaccurate, but may not go so far as to require proof of gender reassignment surgery.
Continue Reading CJEU Rules on Right of Rectification of Gender IdentityFinnish Supervisory Authority Investigates Health Data Transfers to China
On March 17, 2025, the Finnish Supervisory Authority (“SA”) announced that it is investigating the transfer of personal data related to human research samples by a Finnish university to a Chinese company for genetic analysis services.
Continue Reading Finnish Supervisory Authority Investigates Health Data Transfers to ChinaWatchdog to Investigate Mobile Payment Provider Over Its Use of Purchase History for Targeted Advertising
On March 18, 2025, the Norwegian Consumer Council asked the Norwegian Supervisory Authority to investigate a payment app provider for using consumers’ purchase history for targeted advertising.
Continue Reading Watchdog to Investigate Mobile Payment Provider Over Its Use of Purchase History for Targeted AdvertisingBelgian High Court Decides on Abuse of Law in relation to the GDPR Right to File a Complaint
On January 10, 2025, the Belgian High Court (Hof van Cassatie) upheld the decision of the Market Court in a case that pitched the GDPR right to file a complaint against the general legal principle in Belgian law that prohibits the abuse of law.
Continue Reading Belgian High Court Decides on Abuse of Law in relation to the GDPR Right to File a ComplaintEuropean Commission Confirms Plans to Simplify GDPR
On March 13, 2025, the Commissioner for Democracy, Justice, the Rule of Law and Consumer Protection, Michael McGrath, confirmed that the Commission is considering simplifying the GDPR with a view to reducing the burden on smaller businesses. This statement aligns with the Commission’s broader goal of simplifying the EU digital framework.
Continue Reading European Commission Confirms Plans to Simplify GDPREDPB Launches Coordinated Enforcement on the Right to Erasure
Updated
On March 5, 2025, the European Data Protection Board (“EDPB”) announced that EU Supervisory Authorities (“SAs”) will undertake a coordinated enforcement action in 2025 regarding data subjects’ right to erasure under Art. 17 of the GDPR. For context, the EDPB selects a particular topic each year as its focus for pan-EU coordinated enforcement.
Continue Reading EDPB Launches Coordinated Enforcement on the Right to ErasureCJEU Clarifies GDPR Rights on Automated Decision-Making and Trade Secrets
On February 27, 2025, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) issued a significant decision on the right of data subjects to request access to their personal data under Article 15 GDPR, specifically as it relates to automated decision-making and striking an appropriate balance between informing data subjects and protecting trade secrets (Case C‑203/22).
Continue Reading CJEU Clarifies GDPR Rights on Automated Decision-Making and Trade Secrets