Search general data protection

On September 17, 2025, the German Supervisory Authorities (Konferenz der unabhängigen Datenschutzaufsichtsbehörden des Bundes und der Länder, DSK) published new guidelines and recommendations addressing the complex requirements for transferring personal data, particularly health data (including health data contained in biomaterials), to countries outside of the European Economic…

Continue Reading New German Guidelines on GDPR Requirements for International Transfers of Health Data in Medical Research

On September 4, 2025, the Court of Justice of the EU (“Court”) handed down its judgment in case EDPS v SRB C-413/23 P, setting aside the General Court of the European Union’s (“General Court”) judgment of April 26, 2023 in case SRB v EDPS T‑557/20.  In particular, the Court clarified that whether pseudonymized data can be considered as personal data depends on the specific circumstances of the case, such as whether a third party to whom data is transferred by a data controller can reasonably identify the data subject.

We provide below an overview of the Court’s key findings.Continue Reading EU Court of Justice Clarifies the Concept of Personal Data in the Context of a Transfer of Pseudonymized Data to Third Parties

On August 7, Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey signed into law a new Shield Law (S.2543) – the Shield Act 2.0 – that restricts providers’ ability to disclose information in certain health care-related investigations, among other provisions.  Like the Washington Shield Law that was enacted in 2023, the Shield Act 2.0 covers gender-affirming treatment in addition to reproductive health care.  The passage of the Shield Act 2.0 follows Massachusetts’s enactment, in 2022, of a Shield Law that provided protections for Massachusetts healthcare providers from sanctions for providing or assisting in the provision of legally protected reproductive healthcare services or gender-affirming healthcare services in the state.Continue Reading Massachusetts Enacts New Shield Law Expanding Protections for Certain Health Data

Oklahoma recently enacted Senate Bill 626, which substantially amends the state’s data breach notification law to broaden the scope of notification obligations and add a new regulator notification requirement along with a new “safe harbor”-style provision that provides liability protections if certain security measures are implemented.  The changes to Oklahoma’s law follow changes to other state data breach notification laws within the past year, including New York’s addition of a 30-day deadline for notice to individuals (added in early 2025) and Pennsylvania’s addition of a regulator notification requirement and obligations to provide free credit monitoring (added in mid-2024).  Key updates from Oklahoma’s bill, which will go into effect on January 1, 2026, are discussed in further detail below.Continue Reading Oklahoma Substantially Amends Its Data Breach Notification Statute

On July 1, 2025, California Attorney General Bonta announced a $1.55 million settlement, pending court approval, related to allegations that Healthline.com, a website where consumers can read informational articles about medical and health topics, violated the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) and the California Unfair Competition Law.Continue Reading California Attorney General Announces $1.55M CCPA Settlement with Healthline.com

On June 22, Texas Governor Greg Abbott (R) signed the Texas Responsible AI Governance Act (“TRAIGA”) (HB 149) into law.  The law, which takes effect on January 1, 2026, makes Texas the second state to enact comprehensive AI consumer protection legislation, following the 2024 enactment of the Colorado…

Continue Reading Texas Enacts AI Consumer Protection Law

On 24 June 2025, the European Commission published its “roadmap” for ensuring lawful and effective access to data by law enforcement (“Roadmap”). The Roadmap forms a key part of the Commission’s internal security strategy, which was announced in April, and follows on from the November 2024 recommendations of the High-Level Group on Access to Data for Effective Law Enforcement.

Of most immediate relevance to electronic communications service (“ECS”) providers, the Commission intends to propose new data retention requirements, is considering changes to better enable cross-border live interception of communications, and will support the development of tools enabling law enforcement authorities (“LEAs”) to access encrypted data. We describe these proposals, and other elements of the Roadmap, in more detail below.Continue Reading European Commission publishes its plan to enable more effective law enforcement access to data

This blog was prepared in collaboration with, and was originally published by, the UK BioIndustry Association, here. We are grateful to the UK BioIndustry Association for collaborating on this blog, and for the opportunity to post it here.

What are the UK’s plans to reform data protection law?

After an extended period of legislative back and forth, the Data (Use and Access) Bill has now received Royal Assent, becoming the Data (Use and Access) Act (we will therefore refer to it as the “Act” in this blog). The Act addresses various matters related to the use of data, and will to an extent distinguish the UK’s approach to data protection from that set out in the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”). The European Commission will, therefore, assess whether these changes warrant stripping the UK of its adequacy status for data transfers, with a decision due by 27 December 2025. While the Commission is unlikely to withdraw its finding of adequacy, it is possible that a challenge to this finding could be brought before the Court of Justice of the EU, which could reach a different conclusion.

In summary, the Act is not a complete overhaul of data protection law in the UK; instead, it is more a package of targeted amendments. Of the changes most relevant to biotechs, the most significant is the more permissive regime for the use of personal data for scientific research – although, companies must still meet a number of requirements to fall within scope. More significant changes may take place in the future, as key parts of the Act enable the UK Government to pass secondary legislation in areas that may be relevant to biotechs.Continue Reading The UK’s new Data Legislation – What does it mean for the Life Science sector?

On June 10, 2025, the Finnish Data Protection Ombudsman published a decision (in FI) where it found that the processing of personal data for enforcing parking violations was unlawful because the enforcement mechanism was not described in the parking rental agreement.  This recent decision is a striking example of how data protection and consumer protection law are increasingly intertwined.  The case demonstrates that the way in which customer services—and any related enforcement mechanisms for non-performance—are described in contracts is not just a matter of consumer transparency, but a legal requirement for the lawful processing of personal data under Article 6(1)(b) of the GDPR (“processing [that] is necessary for the performance of a contract”).Continue Reading Data Protection Meets Consumer Protection: The Crucial Role of Clear Terms in Service Contracts

On April 15, 2025, the Montana legislature unanimously passed Montana SB 297, a bill that would amend the Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act (“MTCDPA”) with provisions expanding online data protections for minors, narrowing the exemptions under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and removing a controller’s right to cure, among others.  We outline some key provisions below.Continue Reading Montana Passes Amendments to Consumer Data Privacy Act